Archive for the 'Domain Names (Archive)' Category



SnapNames stole my backorder!

Well, that is what an ignorant wannabe domain buyer wrote after he lost an auction at SnapNames. Here comes the story:

Apparently, the individual came across an appealing domain name which he saw was about to delete. He then did some research (including the reading of old articles from 2005) to find out he should go to SnapNames to secure the domain, because SnapNames was the “leader” in this field.

But when he backordered the domain, it turned out that, and this came as a surprise to him, he wouldn’t get it right away. Now, what did he do? Instead of reading SnapNames’ FAQ or terms of service to learn more about the backorder process, he was getting angry, of course. After all, he writes, it was him who discovered the domain first. On SnapNames’ website it clearly says that domains which are successfully backordered will be sent to auction. Anyway, he did decide to bid in the end, because he really wanted the domain name, but when bidding approached $1,000 he stopped and lost the auction.

On his website he writes:

This domain is worth much more than that in the domainer world, so beaker [the other bidder] got a pretty great deal. Thanks to SnapNames’ greedy handling of auctions and backorders, combined with their leading position which makes the most powerful of few options to catch an expired domain, beaker took the name from me. SnapNames stole my backorder, and put it up to resell for more.

Even funnier, his comment on the other bidder:

How did this person even know to go after this name on SnapNames?

It’s just frustrating to see uninformed people write negative things about companies in the domain industry, just because they don’t understand an issue or because they’re angry about domain investors and large corporations holding valuable domains. Even more frustrating, is that the article has already been digged 485 times and is likely to misinform even more people.

The domain industry works just like any other business. The bidder who is willing to pay the most gets the domain. This is not unfair, it is common sense. Would you go to the owners of the buildings on 5th Avenue and complain, “Hey, I want that land”? I guess not. It’s the same thing with domain names. If another buyer is willing to pay more than you, you won’t get that domain. Equally as frustrating, many people from outside the industry complain about all the good domains being taken since the 1990s. That’s what I call a first-mover advantage. Those who were the first to recognize the value and importance of a good domain name bought domains before others did. Common business sense again. This is nothing shady, it is business like in any other industry.

(via DomainState)

WebMediaBrands sells Internet.com for $18 million

Internet.com WebMediaBrands (NASDAQ: WEBM) has sold Internet.com to QuinStreet Inc. for $18 million in an all-cash deal. The sale is not just for the domain name but also includes the website behind it and all of its assets. WebMediaBrands still owns the popular MediaBistro.com, JustTechJobs.com and Graphics.com, which it will continue to operate.

Internet.com was a highly popular tech news website in the late 1990s and early 2000s, but it has lost some popularity over the years. The logo still looks familiar to me, though I can’t recall having visited Internet.com in ages. Another generic domain, InternetNews.com, seems to belong to Internet.com. I’m not sure if that site is included in the deal, but I would assume so given the similar logo and integration into Internet.com.

Digging through my domain news archive, I found a NY Times article reporting that WebMediaBrands originally acquired the domain for more than $100,000 from a web design company in May 1997. The owner of the web design firm also owned other generic premium domains including Finance.com, Risks.com and Breakfast.com, all of which he registered in the early 1990s when most premium domains were still freely available. Apparently, he later sold these as well.

When it bought the Internet.com domain name, WebMediaBrands still went by the name JupiterMedia (the company changed its name in 2009 following the sale of JupiterImages to Getty Images). By the way, this was not the first name change of the company: Founded by Alan Marshall Meckler in 1971, it was first named MecklerMedia. When sold to the larger Penton Media in 1998, the company’s growing Internet business was re-named and spun off into Internet.com Corp. After the burst of the DotCom Bubble in 2001, it became INT Media before becoming JupiterMedia in 2002 and, finally, WebMediaBrands in 2009.

Compete.com says Internet.com receives around 350,000 US visitors per month, and InternetNews.com receives another 150,000 visitors. The company’s MediaBistro.com web service is bigger, receiving between 800,000 and 1 million monthly visitors. The cash from the sale of Internet.com will make WebMediaBrands more liquid, improve its balance sheet and allow for the concentration on its bigger websites and the tradeshows it also operates.

Al Gore wants .ECO TLD

Dot Eco LLC is an organization campaigning for the .ECO top-level domain and it has the support of former presidential candidate Al Gore.

Al Gore has supported several environmental causes over the years, he has been part of an Oscar-winning documentary about climate change and he has received the Nobel Peace Prize. Now he apparently sets out to make the web greener together with Dot Eco LLC. At least, the organization claims that fifty percent of the proceeds from the .ECO TLD would be donated to environmental causes.

Do we really need this TLD? Will it make the world a better place? I doubt it, and from a domain investor’s perspective we sure do not need this new top-level domain. But I think DotEco is more about carrying a message than about launching a profitable domain extension. Dot Eco LLC wants companies to use .ECO domains for their content about eco efforts. Many companies have such content on their websites, but it’s often difficult to find, so moving the content to a DotEco domain or at least forwarding the domain to the web page would indeed make sense.

Another (disputatious) benefit Dot Eco LLC lists on its website, SupportDotEco.com:

…, the .ECO namespace will open up the possibility of getting a meaningful domain name for millions of registrants who have been “shut out” of .COM by speculative domain holders who have quite literally bought every .com name in the dictionary. Instead of paying thousands of dollars in the secondary market for a reasonable .COM, users will be able to find the same name in the .ECO namespace at a fraction of the cost.

I do not think this argument carries much weight, given that .ECO is only a good TLD if you are active in the eco industry or if you want to convince customers that your business is eco-friendly. Other domain registrants will hardly be interested in .ECO and rather opt for .net domains or other existing TLDs if the .COM domain they want has already been registered. I guess this argument is used by all proponents of the many new TLDs which have been proposed since ICANN decided to open up the TLD space, but seriously, DotCom will always remain king.

The .ECO TLD would make a good addition for a very limited group of companies and individuals only, which is why I doubt it would ever be a success. Though, considering that 50% of the proceeds from the operation of the TLD would be donated and that educational content could be made available under .ECO, I find nothing wrong with supporting this new domain extension.

Clothes.com sold for $4.9 million in May 2008

ZapposTechCrunch reports today that when Amazon acquired Zappos in July for more than $900 million, it also bought intangible assets including various domain names.

One of these acquired domain names is Clothes.com. According to Amazon’s SEC filing, Zappos had bought Clothes.com for $4.9 million from Idealab in May 2008. The domain is currently redirecting to a Zappos web page selling clothing products.

In May 2008, we [Zappos] acquired the Clothes.com internet domain name from Idealab. The domain name was recognized as a purchased intangible asset with a useful life of 20 years. The entire purchase price of $4.9 million was assigned to the price of the domain name intangible asset and will be amortized on a straight-line basis over its remaining estimated useful life.

This makes Clothes.com the second-highest domain sale of 2008, topped only by Fund.com, which was sold for close to $10 million. The sale shows once again how many top-dollar domain sales go unnoticed in any given year. But it also shows that many smart companies do care about generic domain names, which they quietly acquire and then use to increase sales and support their brands.

Domain for Sale: SecondLienLoan.com

The domain SecondLienLoan.com will be sold at auction on Bido today!

Second Lien Loan (or last-out participation) is a form of loan with a security interest in the assets of a company that are second in ranking behind a traditional senior credit facility. A lien is a form of security interest granted over an item of property to secure the payment of a debt. Often, second lien loans are used in leveraged buyouts (LBOs).

SecondLienLoan.com is a good finance-related domain name perfect for all providers of financial services and for corporate finance experts. Considering that SecondLienLoan.com is a generic domain with a strong keyword related to a huge industry, use of this domain name can create much value for its owner.

Selection of comparable domain sales:

Loans.com $3,000,000
MyHomeLoan.com $48,888
LowInterestLoans.com $35,000
SchoolLoan.com $35,000
ForeclosureLoans.com $25,000
TruckLoan.com $16,000
ReverseLoans.com $15,000
EmergencyLoan.com $13,000
Loan1.com $10,000
FHAHomeLoan.com $9,000
SearchLoan.com $5,751

The domain expires in late June 2010, so it comes with about one year of registration included. It is currently registered at Moniker.com, one of the best and most secure registrars in the industry.

The auction starts 13 pm EDT on Bido.com, and it will run for one hour only. It is a no-reserve auction with bidding starting at $1. It is possible, however, to place pre-bids before the auction begins, but be sure to be present while the auction is live so that you can react if you’re outbid.

Link to the auction: http://www.bido.com/Auction?name=secondlienloan.com




 Subscribe to this blog:


 Subscribe in a reader

Or, Subscribe by Email

Archives

View Dominik Mueller's profile on LinkedIn
XING
Follow dominikmueller on Twitter