<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google lets advertisers opt out of domain parking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dmueller.com/2008/03/14/search-engines/google-lets-advertisers-opt-out-of-domain-parking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dmueller.com/2008/03/14/online-marketing/google-lets-advertisers-opt-out-of-domain-parking/</link>
	<description>Dominik's blog about domain names, web search, online marketing and economics.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.dmueller.com/2008/03/14/online-marketing/google-lets-advertisers-opt-out-of-domain-parking/#comment-3493</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmueller.com/2008/03/14/search-engines/google-lets-advertisers-opt-out-of-domain-parking/#comment-3493</guid>
		<description>Interesting post - I manage a number of search campaigns and have seen parking traffic perform well in some verticals and less-so in others. Since Google is giving advertisers the ability to see conversions by channel - including parked pages, error pages, forums, social networks, etc. - those with the best converting traffic will gain as the other channels will be paused. In some cases direct-navigation traffic converts quite well (especially generic direct-nav), but since the domain syndication feed is aggregated into one metric, the end result is going to depend on how a given ad performs in that channel. So, while this might hurt parking revenues in the short-run, it gives parking companies a further incentive to improve their traffic quality as the industry matures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post - I manage a number of search campaigns and have seen parking traffic perform well in some verticals and less-so in others. Since Google is giving advertisers the ability to see conversions by channel - including parked pages, error pages, forums, social networks, etc. - those with the best converting traffic will gain as the other channels will be paused. In some cases direct-navigation traffic converts quite well (especially generic direct-nav), but since the domain syndication feed is aggregated into one metric, the end result is going to depend on how a given ad performs in that channel. So, while this might hurt parking revenues in the short-run, it gives parking companies a further incentive to improve their traffic quality as the industry matures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damir</title>
		<link>http://www.dmueller.com/2008/03/14/online-marketing/google-lets-advertisers-opt-out-of-domain-parking/#comment-3486</link>
		<dc:creator>Damir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmueller.com/2008/03/14/search-engines/google-lets-advertisers-opt-out-of-domain-parking/#comment-3486</guid>
		<description>GREAT article and very informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREAT article and very informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
