<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google AdWords &#8220;Automatic Matching&#8221; Beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dmueller.com/2008/02/26/online-marketing/google-adwords-automatic-matching-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dmueller.com/2008/02/26/domain-names-domains/google-adwords-automatic-matching-beta/</link>
	<description>Dominik&#039;s blog about finance, investing and economics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 11:15:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Jacobsen</title>
		<link>http://www.dmueller.com/2008/02/26/domain-names-domains/google-adwords-automatic-matching-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-3373</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Jacobsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmueller.com/2008/02/26/search-engines/google-adwords-automatic-matching-beta/#comment-3373</guid>
		<description>This is interesting because we just discovered this morning that this was happening with our account.  We were a bit baffled until I read your article.

A search for &quot;luggage&quot; would display a text ad from an ad group that did not have the keyword &quot;luggage&quot; associated with it.


For those of us (advertisers) with large campaigns that are highly organized and thoroughly tracked and maintained, this creates problems.  This surprises me because it takes a step away from relevancy...which seems to go against Google&#039;s ultimate goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting because we just discovered this morning that this was happening with our account.  We were a bit baffled until I read your article.</p>
<p>A search for &#8220;luggage&#8221; would display a text ad from an ad group that did not have the keyword &#8220;luggage&#8221; associated with it.</p>
<p>For those of us (advertisers) with large campaigns that are highly organized and thoroughly tracked and maintained, this creates problems.  This surprises me because it takes a step away from relevancy&#8230;which seems to go against Google&#8217;s ultimate goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

