<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quoted: Tim Berners-Lee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dmueller.com/2008/01/23/internet/quoted-tim-berners-lee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dmueller.com/2008/01/23/internet/quoted-tim-berners-lee/</link>
	<description>Dominik's blog about domain names, web search, online marketing and economics.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pixelbug</title>
		<link>http://www.dmueller.com/2008/01/23/internet/quoted-tim-berners-lee/comment-page-1/#comment-3205</link>
		<dc:creator>Pixelbug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dmueller.com/2008/01/23/internet/quoted-tim-berners-lee/#comment-3205</guid>
		<description>Time's A Changin'...

As a professional in the industry, I think Tim was dead on back in 1989. Now in 2008, he still stands correct, well sorta...

These days, we keep seeing more and more brands pushing creativity and good design that it's become mainstream. Everyday-people (non-designers) are learning how to tell the difference between an "ok" site, a well designed site and a site that is just over-the-top. This doesn't just apply to websites — the same goes for movies, commercials and print. People are starting to put a value on design.

Have your Cake and Eat it Too...

A well designed site does not have to sacrifice good usability. Anyone who's practicing this profession knows that in today's market, if you can't deliver both, you're pretty much dead to your competition. Even the most complex sites with thousands of pages deep can look and perform well if thought through properly.

It's a combination of good visual, copy, usability and site architecture that will determine how successful a site can be. ONE OF THE REASON WHY I STRONGLY BELIEVE THAT PARKED PAGES DO NOT PERFORM WELL IS BECAUSE THEY DON'T ADDRESS ALL FOUR CRITERIA.

And then there was GOOGLE...

Despite what you might think, GOOGLE does care about design. Everything from their seasonally changing logo, to their typography and overall clean structure, GOOGLE has done a great job standing out and ahead of the portal crowd. The only other site that I think is successful despite the look and feel is Craig's List – but why fix what's not broken?

-PB

**ANSWER**

I agree with everything you're saying, PB. I didn't say a well-designed site had to sacrifice usability. In fact, design and usability can go hand in hand. But it's important that usability always comes first. And yes, Google cares about design. The point I was trying to make, is that the simplistic layout of their site let them stick out of the other search engines and portals. Google's minimalist site design has been like a message to their users, saying that they want to deliver good results instead of hiding a bad service behind a better design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time&#8217;s A Changin&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>As a professional in the industry, I think Tim was dead on back in 1989. Now in 2008, he still stands correct, well sorta&#8230;</p>
<p>These days, we keep seeing more and more brands pushing creativity and good design that it&#8217;s become mainstream. Everyday-people (non-designers) are learning how to tell the difference between an &#8220;ok&#8221; site, a well designed site and a site that is just over-the-top. This doesn&#8217;t just apply to websites — the same goes for movies, commercials and print. People are starting to put a value on design.</p>
<p>Have your Cake and Eat it Too&#8230;</p>
<p>A well designed site does not have to sacrifice good usability. Anyone who&#8217;s practicing this profession knows that in today&#8217;s market, if you can&#8217;t deliver both, you&#8217;re pretty much dead to your competition. Even the most complex sites with thousands of pages deep can look and perform well if thought through properly.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a combination of good visual, copy, usability and site architecture that will determine how successful a site can be. ONE OF THE REASON WHY I STRONGLY BELIEVE THAT PARKED PAGES DO NOT PERFORM WELL IS BECAUSE THEY DON&#8217;T ADDRESS ALL FOUR CRITERIA.</p>
<p>And then there was GOOGLE&#8230;</p>
<p>Despite what you might think, GOOGLE does care about design. Everything from their seasonally changing logo, to their typography and overall clean structure, GOOGLE has done a great job standing out and ahead of the portal crowd. The only other site that I think is successful despite the look and feel is Craig&#8217;s List – but why fix what&#8217;s not broken?</p>
<p>-PB</p>
<p>**ANSWER**</p>
<p>I agree with everything you&#8217;re saying, PB. I didn&#8217;t say a well-designed site had to sacrifice usability. In fact, design and usability can go hand in hand. But it&#8217;s important that usability always comes first. And yes, Google cares about design. The point I was trying to make, is that the simplistic layout of their site let them stick out of the other search engines and portals. Google&#8217;s minimalist site design has been like a message to their users, saying that they want to deliver good results instead of hiding a bad service behind a better design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
