Archive for May, 2007

New York Times article on NameMedia

The article, titled “Millions of Addresses and Thousands of Sites, All Leading to One“, features NameMedia, the parent company of BuyDomains and Afternic. There has been some bad press about the domain industry lately, so it is nice to see that the New York Times article makes a clear difference between cybersquatting and the business of monetizing generic domain names:

The business is a far cry from the days of cybersquatting, where speculators bought up names of businesses to which they had no legitimate claim, but it does represent a vindication of sorts for many who bought hundreds or thousands of random Web address names on the hope that one day they would be worth something.

The article also does a good job explaining the value of direct navigation traffic:

Behind this suddenly active business category - which includes companies like iREIT in Houston, Marchex in Seattle, and Demand Media in Santa Monica, Calif. - is the recognition that not all Internet users turn to a search engine when they are confused about where to find something online.

(…)

The direct navigation market attracted more than $800 million in ads last year, which publishers largely shared with Google and Yahoo. That figure could reach $1.1 billion in 2007, said Jordan Rohan, an analyst with RBC Capital Markets.

Link to the article.

Google to acquire Feedburner?

GoogleFeedburner

Rumor has it that Google will be acquiring Feedburner for $100 million. If this is correct, Feedburner will help Google to finally monetize RSS feeds. For example, Google could display PPC ads on all Feedburner RSS pages. Most blog readers do not actually visit blogs anymore, because they read blogs via RSS readers such as Feedburner. This means many readers do not see the PPC ads on blogs. So if Google can get PPC ads on RSS feeds, they will get their AdSense or DoubleClick ads in front of the large readership using Feedburner, which will result in a nice revenue jump for them. Considering the value of the RSS ad market, the $100 million price doesn’t seem all-too high to me.

Domain Extension Typos

There has been quite some negative media coverage of .CM lately. .CM is Cameroon’s ccTLD and it is also a common typo of .COM. That is why Kevin Ham from Reinvent Technology has helped Cameroon monetize the traffic to its unregistered domain names by setting up a wild-card that forwards the .CM error traffic to parking pages with relevant ad links. This procedure has caused lots of negative press and deprecative comments from journalists and bloggers. For example, Michael Arrington has a post on his Techcrunch.com blog titled “The .CM Scam“:

Business 2.0’s Paul Sloan has been digging into the .CM domain name scam.
(…)
This is actually one of the cleaner scams occurring in the extremely dirty domain name business.

Michael Arrington is wrong. The .CM wild-card is no scam. It is legal because only unregistered domains are being monetized, as I pointed out in another post on this blog yesterday. By the way, I don’t understand how somebody who worked in the domain business for a relatively long time (Michael Arrington worked at Pool.com) can say that the domain business is “extremely dirty”. Cybersquatting is a problem, but it’s only done by a handful of black sheep. The domain business as a whole is certainly not dirty or a playground for scammers.

Now, why am I writing this if I have already expressed my opinion on .CM in an earlier post on my blog and in comments on other blogs? I’m writing this because I want to point out that there are companies who are earning much more money from domain name typos than Cameroon and Kevin Ham: Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) and Google (NASDAQ: GOOG)! And not only them, the following companies are also in the game of monetizing error type-in traffic: Dell (NASDAQ: DELL), Gateway (NYSE: GTW), Sony (NYSE: SNE) and several others. These companies are the big profiteers of domain name typos.

For example, I have a Dell desktop computer. Dell and Google have a partnership and all Dell computers have software preinstalled that automatically forwards error traffic to a Dell/Google web page with ad links served by Google. So if I accidentally type “loan.xom” instead of “loan.com” I get to a page that looks as follows (click on the image to go to the actual site):

Dell/Google making money from domain typos

As you will see, the page is filled with targeted ad links. Google is upset that Yahoo is making money from Google.cm (Yahoo serves the ads for the .CM domains), but .CM is only one extension. Google is making money from almost all other possible domain extension typos (.xom, .cpm, etc.) and they get paid for every click on an ad on Yahoo.xom, for instance. It is almost impossible to get rid of Google’s spyware. Dell and Google preinstall a little program on every Dell computer which is only very hard to find and remove.

As I said, Gateway, Sony and others are having the same partnership with Google. So Google is actually one of the biggest domain typo profiteers on the planet, although they say they are a “do not evil” company. They do not only monetize generic typos, but they also monetize TM typo traffic (e.g. yahoo.xom, bankofamerica.cpm).

Moreover, Google also forwards you to a parking page if you type in a domain that is not registered or if you want to visit a domain that cannot be reached in that moment. So they have a sort of wild-card on every Dell computer generating millions of dollars in annual revenue from domain name typos.

I don’t want to point the finger at Dell only, so here are two screenshots of Google pay-per-click pages designed for Gateway and Sony (again you can click on the image to visit the actual PPC site):

Gateway/Google making money from domain name typos

Sony/Google making money from domain name typos

And Google goes even further. They have a partnership with the Firefox web browser, too. So if anybody types in loan.xom in Firefox he or she gets forwarded to a parking page as well.

Microsoft is doing the same with Internet Explorer on computers where Google’s typo program is not preinstalled. If you type a wrong URL into the address bar of Internet Explorer you will be served a pay-per-click page, too.

You see, as soon as somebody like Kevin Ham profits from the typos of others, there is lots of bad press. But Microsoft and Google are much bigger players in this game! Let me repeat this: These companies are not doing anything illegal, because it is allowed to serve pay-per-click pages based on a wild-card that sorts out traffic to unregistered domain names. It is not allowed, on the other hand, to register a domain that infringes the trademark of another company. People registering TM domains and TM typos are the black sheep who harm the image of the domain name business. Kevin Ham does not belong to this group of people, although I see where some of the critics are coming from, especially considering that people from Cameroon cannot register their own country’s domains because they’re too expensive for the average citizen in Cameroon.

However, if people like Michael Arrington say the domain business is an industry full of typosquatters and scammers, what would they call Microsoft and Google then?

Personally, I don’t feel good about .CM either, but it is legal and it has been the country’s decision to monetize their own ccTLD. Google and Microsoft do not own .XOM, .CPM or any of the other possible domain extension typos, so if they serve pay-per-click ads on error pages that’s much worse, in my opinion.

Related blog posts you should read:

* Is Google Pushing Spyware? And If They Do, Is It Of A Better Quality Than Competitors’ Spyware?
* Yahoo Outsmarts Google, Google Gets Pissed
* Google turns the page… in a bad way
* Google and Dell Team Up For Evil/Spyware?
* Funding ICANN, “Shawdow TLDs” and the Next Domain Name You Really Want to Buy
* Microsoft Quietly Making Untold Millions

CNBC On The Money clip on Kevin Ham

I finally got the chance to see the actual clip on CNBC’s On The Money and I’m disappointed to say the least. The clip has been titled “He makes millions on typos” and it talks about nothing but typosquatting. After all, the clip is pretty bad press for the domain industry, because people from outside the industry might have been confirmed in their views of domainers as tricksters and cybersquatters. Having also re-read the Business 2.0 article several times, I must say it contains many negative points too and only adds to the bad image of domainers as people making money from the trademarks of other companies.

This is so untrue! There are only very few black sheep in the industry and it’s them who feed the bad image domainers are having in the public. Don’t get me wrong. Paul Sloan’s article is well-written, but it certainly leaves a bad aftertaste. Kevin Ham owns a very nice generic domain portfolio and he is not cybersquatting with his .cm scheme, because he’s only monetizing domains that are not registered. Though, the article is the cover story of Business 2.0’s June edition and most people who will read it are not into domain investing. Therefore, many of these people do not see the difference between monetizing generic domains and earning money from typos and I believe many of the readers will think Kevin is running some kind of shady business, which he is not. He’s only having a wild-card refresh the URL of unregistered .cm domains to point to a specific page. This is legal and both Microsoft and Google have been doing this for a long time with unregistered domains, domain extension typos (e.g. .xom, .cpm) and domains that cannot be reached by having their browser (Microsoft: Internet Explorer; Google: FireFox) forward the typo traffic to a parking page. In fact, the Microsoft/Google scheme goes a step further than Kevin Ham, because Microsoft and Google make money from TLDs that do not even exist. On the other hand, .cm belongs to Cameroon and it has been the country’s decision to monetize the typo traffic arriving at their domain extension.

Link to the clip on CNBC:

http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?f=00&g=f53c6e8b-7658-4542-a7d1-1f60d0a15c14&p=Source_CNBC&t=s55&rf=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12632064/&fg=

Business 2.0 article on Kevin Ham

Paul Sloan’s new article, which I wrote about in an earlier blog post, has now been made available online at Business2.com. It’s about Kevin Ham of Reinvent Technology and the title is “The Man Who Owns The Internet”.

I’ve done business with Kevin Ham myself and I can say it’s been a pleasure dealing with him. He’s a very active buyer of generic .com domains. His latest coup is that he partnered with Cameroon to monetize the tons of daily typo traffic of the country’s unregistered .cm domain names.

Read the full story on CNNMoney.

New Domain Article & Domains on CNBC

Paul Sloan wrote a new Business 2.0 article on the domain industry. This time he wrote about one of the world’s most successful domain investors, but Sahar says it’s not Frank Schilling and it’s not Rick Schwartz. The article will be posted on Business2.com later today, so we’ll soon find out who it is about. Paul Sloan also recorded an interview with CNBC’s On The Money.

From his blog:

I just recorded an interview for CNBC about a cover story that I wrote for the June issue of Business2.0, which is now on its way to subscribers. The interview (or a tiny piece of it) will be on a program called On The Money, which airs at 7 pm eastern. (…) The magazine article, which is about one of the world’s top domainers, is scheduled to be posted tomorrow at Business2.com.

Spare time spent online increases

According to a Media-Screen report, broadband users spend almost half their spare time on the Internet. Most of the time online is spent on communication and entertainment. The report also says that broadband users devote more of their time to sending emails and visiting web sites than watching TV.

“Josh Crandall of Media-Screen said that the point of the results was not that broadband users spend more time online, but that online marketing is still underused in proportion to that time.”

Full article: Internet Captures Half of Spare Time

Porn.com sold for $9 million

MXN Ltd., affiliated with adult website network PIMPROLL.COM, announced the acquisition of Porn.com for about $9 million. According to the press release, the new owner is going to develop the domain, which he expects to be a longer-term project. In the meantime, they’re going to park it at PremiumTraffic.com to monetize the domain’s massive direct navigation traffic.

Internet Pornography Stats

GOOD Magazine posted this video with interesting facts about the Internet pornography industry on YouTube:

  • 12% of all websites are porn-related
  • 25% of all search engine requests are pornographic
  • 35% of all Internet downloads are pornographic
  • $89 is spent on Internet porn every second
  • $2.84 billion in revenue was generated by U.S. porn sites in 2006
  • 260 new porn sites go online every day

(via Techcrunch.com)

Quoted: Richard Parsons

Time Warner CEO Richard Parsons on online copyright infringements:

The Googles of the world, they are the Custer of the modern world. We are the Sioux nation. They will lose this war if they go to war. The notion that the new kids on the block have taken over is a false notion.

Read the full article here: Old media turns combative against new media